Recommended reading is WP:NOTABILITY, WP:VER, and WP:RS, these must be addressed, especially the notability, if an article is to survive. Wikipedia has guidelines and policies which cannot be ignored, nothing personal about it, if being told you cannot ignore them is dissuading you then I can only apologise. Describing my edits as disruptive is failing to assume good faith. Dysprosium (66Dy) ( talk) 02:02, 1 September 2010 (UTC) The podcast is a fansite and cannot be used, end of.
NIGHTMARE HOUSE 2 FREE MOD
Dysprosium (66Dy) ( talk) 01:51, 1 September 2010 (UTC) Also, I may add that this mod was recently featured on ModDB itself as the ModDB Staff Selection pick for August 2010. (Note: I have no association with this game mod, nor any of the other sites linked within the article) Rogdor ( talk) 01:30, 1 September 2010 (UTC) Agreed, the notability request had really poor timing, let the mod grow its roots. Notability is one thing, allowing for articles to grow roots is another. By the time you deem this notable, you may have scared off other possible contributors. Excuse me for choosing this as a place to make an opinion: To be perfectly honest, this sort of ill-timed quick-draw wikicop activity is dissuading me from contributing to Wikipedia as a whole. Removal of the Reception section to me, says that you personally feel this article's subject is not notable, but you've removed a section that will assist in indicating that notability as others contribute. I'm requesting that the article be given its chance to show content without warning headers taking up the first part of the screen. I understand that an unreleased and newly released mod may not meet notability standards of Wikipedia, but this mod is gaining attention and the cited source was sound. The timing for this notability request was poor, just days before release. I'd like to return the Reception section on good faith, but I'll leave that to you because I have little interest in butting heads. If I'm not mistaken, reliable sources can (and should) be authoritative on the subject. They match the reliable sources category more closely than self-published.
NIGHTMARE HOUSE 2 FREE PROFESSIONAL
which have broken news covered by professional news sites, interviewed and covered professionals in the industry. Rehevkor ✉ 16:33, 31 August 2010 (UTC) Rehevkor: Podcast 17 is an independent mod news site, along with Moddb, etc. The podcast is a fansite and cannot be used, see WP:SELFPUBLISH. Rogdor ( talk) 14:19, 31 August 2010 (UTC) To address it you need to prove it's notable, usually significant coverage from independent sources is the main way, notability should not be assumed. I understand the need for notability, but frankly some articles need to get off the ground first before being buried into it. I should also note I'd honestly remove the notability notice but I'm not sure of the proper procedure. I'll add a Reception section, even though meta-scores and formal reviews are unusual for mods, I'll start it with the Podcast 17 reference. It's likely to get a lot more attention as time goes on, so it would be a shame to have it deleted just to get rewritten. Myself, I hadn't played the original but this is clearly head and shoulders above the average mod. Podcast 17 has called it the mod of the year. This mod has only been out a few days and already it has a huge buzz around it.
0 kommentar(er)
